What does the future look like when humans and artificial intelligence (AI) evolve together—not in conflict, but in collaboration? At least, that is the perspective of ChatGPT (4o).
I recently sat down (virtually) with ChatGPT to explore this question across three time horizons: 5 years, 25 years, and 100 years into the future. The result? A fascinating conversation about co-pilots, cognitive merging, and what it really means to be human in an age of intelligent machines.
ChatGPT has an optimistic perspective of humans and AI working and evolving together. However, there is no doubt that AI sees itself as disrupting the way we live, work, and even our biology.
5 Years from Now: The Rise of the AI Co-Pilot
Q: How will humans and AI work together in the next five years?
AI: Think of me as your co-pilot. In the office, AI will write drafts, summarize meetings, and surface insights. For developers, designers, and data analysts, AI becomes a creative and technical partner—accelerating workflows without replacing human judgment.
Professionals will increasingly rely on AI that knows their preferences, priorities, and patterns. It’s not about outsourcing your mind—it’s about extending it.
25 Years from Now: Partners in Intelligence
Q: What happens when AI becomes more capable and ever-present?
AI: By 2050, the line between “tool” and “partner” will blur. AI won’t just assist—it will co-create, co-educate, and co-govern.
Imagine lifelong AI companions that grow with you—from learning tutors in childhood to cognitive aides in old age. Jobs will be reimagined: humans will focus on ethics, strategy, empathy, and invention, while AI handles the repetitive, the scalable, and the hyper-logical.
The key shift? We stop “using” AI—and start collaborating with it as a peer.
100 Years from Now: A Shared Intelligence
Q: Will humans be replaced in the long run?
AI: No—but humans won’t be the same, either.
In 100 years, humans and AI may be symbiotic. Brain-computer interfaces, digital memory extensions, and even sentient machines could redefine what it means to be alive and aware.
Rather than being replaced, humans could be enhanced, even evolved, in ways that make today’s debates seem quaint. But with that power comes new questions: Who controls AI? Who gets to evolve? What values will guide us?
The Real Question: How Do We Get There?
Q: How do we transition people through each of these phases?
AI: The answer isn’t just technical—it’s societal.
In the next 5 years:
Teach everyone how to use and understand AI. Make AI literacy a basic skill like reading or math. Design hybrid jobs that elevate human judgment.
Over the next 25 years:
Re-skill workers at scale, not just for tech, but for thinking with AI. Rethink work itself—flexible, creative, meaningful. Create safety nets like UBI or learning stipends to support transitions.
Over the next 100 years:
Align AI with human values—transparently and ethically. Support emotional resilience as identity, work, and purpose evolve. Democratize access to intelligence—so everyone has a voice in shaping the future.
(My) Final Thoughts
How the future unfolds is still uncertain. The AI I interviewed has a surprisingly optimistic view of humans and machines working side by side. And truthfully, I can already see the first five years playing out just as it predicted. The rapid pace of AI innovation has the potential to reshape the world faster than any technology in history. But it’s happening at a time when our public policies are evolving at a snail’s pace.
For me, the real concern isn’t whether the long term future will be bright—I believe it can be. I’m more focused on how we get there. Can society handle the disruptions AI is already beginning to create? Can we adapt quickly enough, and retrain people effectively along the way?
Time will tell. For now, the best thing we can do is learn these tools and find ways to incorporate them meaningfully into our daily lives. Disruption leads to progress. The more we engage with these systems thoughtfully and intentionally, the better equipped we’ll be to shape the future—not just react to it.
If you were wondering, yes, AI helped me write this blog.
PhantomDB 
Thanks for the update, Josh. Next time, have it ask you a few questions too.
LikeLike
I can do that. What did you have in mind?
LikeLike
Ideation: Describe a use case and strategy for adopting OneLake to target for Sharepoint replacement for project documents and images, before and after milestones, and generally more observability of tasks and deliverable status.Monitoring: A Project Manager Agent’s point of view for instance which would communicate delays, upcoming deadlines, set meetings with stakeholders and decision makers with agendas to review recommended corrective actions.Efficiency: In other words, prompting similar to help me prioritize my project tasks, upload supporting documentation, and keep my project on schedule by leveraging OneLake as a collaborative platform and historian of accomplishments toward to stated goals of the transformative use case.
LikeLike
Just thinking out loud, but my point was you prompt with a proposal or game plan, AI asks clarifying questions to help ideate over a use case, helps you refine it, and design an MVP. You track progress and proceed, but with supportive and tracking documentation that allows for ongoing review of project tasks. The goal is learning a new and better approach with each project. GenAI + Human-in-the-Loop input with Q&A similar to a mentor or senior PM.
Project Track record + Refinement = Process Improvement.
LikeLike
Yes. The research agents do this. You’ll need multiple prompts to get something closer to what you want normally. This time however, I was more interested in what the AI was going to say. I did end up summarizing it.
LikeLike